Executive questionsWhat the institution needs to be able to answer.
- 01Do we know the AI systems within the management-system scope?
- 02Are AI responsibilities and decision authorities explicit?
- 03Can we show how risks, controls and evidence are connected?
- 04Can management review AI performance and corrective actions using reliable records?
Operating modelTurn the requirement into institutional workflow.
01Define the AI estate
Create a governed scope of AI systems, services, suppliers and material use cases.
02Assign authority
Connect policy, ownership, approvals and review responsibilities to actual systems and decisions.
03Operate the controls
Move beyond static documentation by linking controls to workflows, evidence and accountable operators.
04Create management evidence
Preserve decisions, incidents, reviews, outcomes and improvements so the management system can be inspected over time.
EvidenceWhat should be preserved.
- AI inventory and scope records
- Policies and objectives
- Risk and impact assessments
- Control ownership
- Monitoring and assurance records
- Incidents and corrective actions
- Management review evidence
Cybatar operating layerWhere the platform supports the operating model.
AI EstateAI ControlAI AssuranceEvidence FabricExecutive Control TowerAudit Room
Cybatar can support management-system evidence and operating workflows. Use of Cybatar does not by itself constitute ISO/IEC 42001 certification.