Singapore · framework

Singapore Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AI

Governance framework addressing generative-AI concerns across accountability, data, trusted development, incident reporting, testing, security, provenance and safety.

voluntaryInfocomm Media Development Authority / AI Verify FoundationVerified 23 Aug 2026

Applicability

Generative AI ecosystem participants.

Enforcement context

Voluntary framework.

Regulatory timeline

Material dates and status changes.

30 May 2024

Singapore GenAI Framework

Governance framework addressing generative-AI concerns across accountability, data, trusted development, incident reporting, testing, security, provenance and safety.

Source for this event →

CRG implementation mapping

Operational obligations and evidence expectations.

SG-GEN-INC

Incident reporting readiness

Maintain mechanisms to identify, escalate, investigate and learn from material AI incidents.

Actor: developers/deployers · Domain: incident response

Evidence: Incident taxonomy, reporting channels, response playbooks and post-incident review.

SG-GEN-TEST

Generative AI testing and assurance

Use structured testing and assurance appropriate to system risks and deployment context.

Actor: developers/deployers · Domain: evaluation

Evidence: Evaluation plan, independent review where appropriate and remediation evidence.

Primary source

Verify the underlying instrument.

Cybatar's mapping is designed for AI governance and assurance work. Legal interpretation remains anchored to the current primary text and competent authority guidance.

Open IMDA Singapore source